https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
Just another trivial beet up.
A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of Luxon
for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
issues involved.
You would think that the press and yourself would have something of substance
to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government is
doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the plan
right now, what childish nonsense.

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>Just another trivial beet up.
>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of Luxon
>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
>issues involved.
>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of substance
>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government is
>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the plan
>right now, what childish nonsense.

Have a look here:
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth

or here:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>
>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>>Just another trivial beet up.
>>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of Luxon
>>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
>>issues involved.
>>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of substance
>>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government is
>>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the
>>plan
>>right now, what childish nonsense.
>
>Have a look here:
>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth
>
>or here:
>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/
No. It is a childish, beat up. There are obvious security issues with allowing
the press to go through the house.

GODLESS QUEER VAXX MASS MURDER ----> RICH80105.
"X-MAS" <---------- DENOTES GODLESS FUKWIT ANTICHRIST SPIRIT RICH8015.

"Rich80105" wrote in message
news:k1rhuihb82jucg2s4j5irbmfe1gfh3fcr1@4ax.com...

https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:44:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>
>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>>>Just another trivial beet up.
>>>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of Luxon
>>>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
>>>issues involved.
>>>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of substance
>>>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government is
>>>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the
>>>plan
>>>right now, what childish nonsense.
>>
>>Have a look here:
>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth
>>
>>or here:
>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/
>No. It is a childish, beat up. There are obvious security issues with allowing
>the press to go through the house.
Rubbish - press have been to plenty of functions at Premier House -
but I would not have expected the press to attend a family party at
his new residence.

They apparently had a good time - it was only later that Luxon
appeared to change his mind - and yes he was entitled to claim
$52,000. Sadly for him there was a precedent of not treating taxpayers
like an ATM in Bill English deciding that it was not a good look for
him to claim it for his Karori House, the minders must have been very
quick off the mark to get him to back down so quickly - but by then he
presumable felt he had to keep up the story about Premier House not
being suitable for him - and presumably there was no-one able to get
it fixed - that would have been far too hard.

A THOROUGH PARANORMAL EXAMINATION MUST BE PERFORMED.
(?) --WHAT DEMONIC CREATURES ARE STILL HOVERING AND IN THAT
PIECE OF PROPERTY --

ENGLAND PROPER IS A WHOLE CAST OF OLDE GHOST HOUSES . . .
CLEAR -- REAL -- DEMONIC ACTIVITY --
NEW ZELANDT BLACK EURO "nobility" ---> ENOUGH PIT OF HELL
PHOENECIAN WALES IN TE AOTEAROA AS CLEAR DEMON
DRAGON INVADERS . . . and inviting red dragon chinese to
buy up the islands . . . all while john key the total sell-out
porno family is breaking his arm falling down in china . . .

LUXON -- PURPORTED "christian" -- DROWNING IN HIS CULT
OF FREEMASON LUCIFERIAN DARK SIDE DEMONIC CONJURING
CREATURES -----------> BEEHIVE (beer belly) . . . NON SOBER NATION.

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:44:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>
>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>>>>Just another trivial beet up.
>>>>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of
>>>>Luxon
>>>>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
>>>>issues involved.
>>>>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of
>>>>substance
>>>>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government
>>>>is
>>>>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the
>>>>plan
>>>>right now, what childish nonsense.
>>>
>>>Have a look here:
>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth
>>>
>>>or here:
>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/
>>No. It is a childish, beat up. There are obvious security issues with
>>allowing
>>the press to go through the house.
>Rubbish - press have been to plenty of functions at Premier House -
Controlled access to specific parts - they don't visit the accommodation
bedrooms etc).
Why don't you think before spewing?

>but I would not have expected the press to attend a family party at
>his new residence.
Really, you don't say - well I never!
>
>They apparently had a good time
>- it was only later that Luxon
>appeared to change his mind - and yes he was entitled to claim
>$52,000. Sadly for him there was a precedent of not treating taxpayers
>like an ATM in Bill English deciding that it was not a good look for
>him to claim it for his Karori House, the minders must have been very
>quick off the mark to get him to back down so quickly - but by then he
>presumable felt he had to keep up the story about Premier House not
>being suitable for him - and presumably there was no-one able to get
>it fixed - that would have been far too hard.
Rubbish.

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:09:24 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:44:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>
>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>>>>>Just another trivial beet up.
>>>>>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of
>>>>>Luxon
>>>>>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious security
>>>>>issues involved.
>>>>>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of
>>>>>substance
>>>>>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government
>>>>>is
>>>>>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the
>>>>>plan
>>>>>right now, what childish nonsense.
>>>>
>>>>Have a look here:
>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth
>>>>
>>>>or here:
>>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/
>>>No. It is a childish, beat up. There are obvious security issues with
>>>allowing
>>>the press to go through the house.
>>Rubbish - press have been to plenty of functions at Premier House -
>Controlled access to specific parts - they don't visit the accommodation
>bedrooms etc).
>Why don't you think before spewing?
>
>>but I would not have expected the press to attend a family party at
>>his new residence.
>Really, you don't say - well I never!

Indeed, I have observed that you never!

There is the assertion that the accommodation for the Prime Minister
is inadequate - why are they not letting the press go and have a look
and show the public the horrors of accommodation that has been good
enough for a few previous Prime Ministers - perhaps you did not
realise that Luxon is not actually living there at present?

>>They apparently had a good time
>>- it was only later that Luxon
>>appeared to change his mind - and yes he was entitled to claim
>>$52,000. Sadly for him there was a precedent of not treating taxpayers
>>like an ATM in Bill English deciding that it was not a good look for
>>him to claim it for his Karori House, the minders must have been very
>>quick off the mark to get him to back down so quickly - but by then he
>>presumable felt he had to keep up the story about Premier House not
>>being suitable for him - and presumably there was no-one able to get
>>it fixed - that would have been far too hard.
>Rubbish.

I agree with you - Luxon has a whole government there to do what he
asks - all he had to do it tell someone to get it fixed. Clearly you
do not believe that Luxon is able to "get things done", but this is
not nearly as hard as paying off political donors like the Tobacco
companies . . .

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:09:24 -0000 (UTC), Tony
><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>
>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:44:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:20:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350203582/premier-house-suitable-big-luxon-family-xmas-bash
>>>>>>Just another trivial beet up.
>>>>>>A couple of days is not the same as living there. And the criticism of
>>>>>>Luxon
>>>>>>for not allowing the press to visit is stupid - there are obvious
>>>>>>security
>>>>>>issues involved.
>>>>>>You would think that the press and yourself would have something of
>>>>>>substance
>>>>>>to criticse the government for but apparently not, perhaps the government
>>>>>>is
>>>>>>doing well. However personal attacks aimed at the PM would seem to be the
>>>>>>plan
>>>>>>right now, what childish nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have a look here:
>>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/tell-the-truth
>>>>>
>>>>>or here:
>>>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christopher-luxons-use-of-public-funds-for-his-home-may-be-legal-but-is-it-justifiable-arena-williams/4SSPZXXZFRBX3CJVODKN6FPVVE/
>>>>No. It is a childish, beat up. There are obvious security issues with
>>>>allowing
>>>>the press to go through the house.
>>>Rubbish - press have been to plenty of functions at Premier House -
>>Controlled access to specific parts - they don't visit the accommodation
>>bedrooms etc).
>>Why don't you think before spewing?
>>
>>>but I would not have expected the press to attend a family party at
>>>his new residence.
>>Really, you don't say - well I never!
>
Abuse removed.
>
>There is the assertion that the accommodation for the Prime Minister
>is inadequate - why are they not letting the press go and have a look
>and show the public the horrors of accommodation that has been good
>enough for a few previous Prime Ministers - perhaps you did not
>realise that Luxon is not actually living there at present?
Perhaps you don't read what people post. I am aware and that is common
knowledge.
Time passes, houses get older and need maintenance - the house need work.
Period.
>
>>>They apparently had a good time
>>>- it was only later that Luxon
>>>appeared to change his mind - and yes he was entitled to claim
>>>$52,000. Sadly for him there was a precedent of not treating taxpayers
>>>like an ATM in Bill English deciding that it was not a good look for
>>>him to claim it for his Karori House, the minders must have been very
>>>quick off the mark to get him to back down so quickly - but by then he
>>>presumable felt he had to keep up the story about Premier House not
>>>being suitable for him - and presumably there was no-one able to get
>>>it fixed - that would have been far too hard.
>>Rubbish.
>
Sarcasm, deliberate twisiting of my words removed. In other words abuse removed.